Lia Thomas is not the first trans swimmer in the N.C.A.A., but her victories have put her at the center of a debate about trans athletes. Photograph by Hunter Martin / Getty “Is it ethical to require medical interventions of healthy people who wish to compete in women’s sports? What basic rights apply to athletics?” In a gripping piece, Louisa Thomas outlines the fierce debate about transgender participation in élite sports—and considers the fixation around Lia Thomas, a swimmer in her early twenties who competes for the University of Pennsylvania. Against a political backdrop in which hundreds of bills have been introduced to restrict transgender people’s access to sports and health care, “the argument about Lia Thomas . . . is also an argument about whether there are, finally, defining lines, and who gets to set them.” The N.C.A.A. Championships began yesterday and continue through Saturday, and the arguments around Thomas’s participation have been heated. This past December, a group of parents of Penn swimmers anonymously sent a letter to the N.C.A.A., arguing that Thomas should not be allowed to compete. And, in February, a letter released on behalf of sixteen unnamed Penn swimmers—almost half the team—urged the school not to fight for Thomas’s ability to participate if more restrictive rules were adopted by the N.C.A.A. In the end, the N.C.A.A. chose not to change its policies midseason, allowing Thomas to participate, but, going forward, the goals of the evolving rules that define transgender participation seem clear. As Thomas writes, “They will be allowed to swim, but, in most cases, not to win.” —Jessie Li, newsletter editor |
No comments:
Post a Comment