A jury in Alabama awarded the former Senate candidate more than eight million dollars. A lawyer for the defense says that the case reflects a worrying trend. Photograph by Julie Bennett / AP Five years ago, Charles Bethea was reporting on the Senate race in Alabama when he visited the Gadsden Mall, northeast of Birmingham, where more than dozen people he spoke to, including police officers and former store managers, said that the Republican candidate, Roy Moore, had been banned from the mall for bothering teen-age girls. Moore, a former chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, lost the election. He also began filing lawsuits. This year, in August, he won one of them, brought against a Democratic Party-aligned PAC that helped fund a 2017 ad, in which a narrator describes Moore’s pursuit of underage girls, quoting various news outlets—including Bethea’s reporting. “The jury,” Bethea writes, “which was composed of five men and three women, all but one of them white, rendered a verdict in less than two hours, awarding Moore more than eight million dollars in damages.” Bethea delves into how the case unfolded—with surprise testimony from a former officer at the mall—and how it has set off crucial questions about the future of libel law. —Jessie Li, newsletter editor Support The New Yorker’s award-winning journalism. Subscribe today » |
No comments:
Post a Comment